Shame on Congress

Shame. On. You.

Patricia Maisch had it right when she yelled those three words from the gallery following the Senate’s defeat, 54-46, of a background checks bill on gun purchases.  Maisch was present two years ago in Tucson when a gunman with an assault weapon killed six people and wounded 13, including former Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords.

By agreement of Senate leaders, a 60-vote majority was needed for approval.

It’s fair to say that a lot graves were walked on yesterday.  Graves that should never have been dug in the first place.  Graves of those lost way too early — of children, teens, college students, and adults killed by gun violence at Virginia Tech and Columbine; in Aurora, Tucson, Newton, Chicago, and countless other communities.

The grave stomping was committed by 41 Republican Senators and four Democratic Senators who stubbornly and cowardly refused to support a basic bill on background checks that repeated polls showed 90 percent of Americans supported.

Those who voted “no” were 90 percent of Republicans and Democrats Mark Begich of Alaska, Max Baucus of Montana, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, and Mark Pryor of Arkansas.  That’s Begich, Baucus, Heitkamp, and Pryor.

Of the Senators who voted “nay,” Erica Lafferty, the daughter of the principal at Sandy Hook, who was killed along with 20 children — first graders — and five other educators, said: “The next time there’s a mass shooting and they’re asked what they did to prevent it, they’re going to have to say nothing.”

If that isn’t enough, imagine the nerve.  The nerve of so-called leaders who knew what was right but instead voted to protect their paychecks and to remain deep in pockets of the filthy rich and cold-blooded gun lobby. “Leaders” who voted no with Newtown families and their former colleague, Giffords, in their midst. If that doesn’t turn your stomach, I don’t know what will.

To be a leader requires the ability to empathize. If a person can only understand the depth of a tragedy when it happens to him and not to his fellow citizen, he is not a leader.  If a person cannot see a problem with guns when 20 terrified first graders are mowed down in cold blood, she is not a leader.  If people cannot look into the eyes of a colleague who was nearly killed and can no longer function in Congress, and still not see a need for drastic changes, they are not leaders. They are cowards.

But make no mistake.  There is passionate resolve on the part of those who desire stricter gun laws.  The Newtown families aren’t going away.  Gabby Giffords isn’t backing down; just take a look at her editorial in today’s New York Times. West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, the Democratic co-sponsor of the background checks bill has pledged to continue his push. (Although his Republican co-sponsor Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, sadly, has said he is moving on to other business.) The folks in Colorado aren’t giving up — that state and Connecticut recently passed stricter gun laws.

We are not giving up.  As President Obama said: this was just Round One.  Cowardice doesn’t win in the end. What is Right does.

Your voice is needed.  You must contact the officials who opposed this legislation and tell them they will not have your vote. If they don’t have your back and the backs of our babies, why should you have theirs? Go to www.senate.gov Click on the red “senators” tab and find your representative.  Then, write an email, leave a voice mail.  Do it again.  And again.  Make it the issue of the 2014 election.

More regulations – sensible regulations of which we are in dire need after losing hundreds of thousand — will happen. Comprehensive background checks.  Restrictions on magazine sizes.  Perhaps even an assault-weapons ban.

All are common-sense measures.  No brainers.

Shame on Congress if it takes another tragedy before they do their jobs.

 

The Time to Speak is Now

You know how you wonder whether your one vote and one voice can make a difference?  Today’s mission is to convince you that they can. The trajectory of day-to-day politics is becoming more and more about the little people, i.e. “us,” especially given the rabid intransigence of the Conservative block of the House of Representatives.

Democrats aren’t off the hook.  More than a handful in the Senate remain opposed to marriage equality and other issues of fairness. The only way either faction will act is if they are pushed by We the People.

What should we expect from our “leaders”?

For starters, we might expect them to take the pulse of their constituents and the nation and then to act in a way that is fair and compassionate to the majority, not merely to safeguard themselves or their financial backers.  We should expect our elected officials to be willing to put their jobs on the line for what they know to be right and just.

Three measures are urgently in need of your voice:

  1. Gun Control: Ninety percent of Americans believe there should be background checks on gun purchases. Seven of 10 members of the National Rifle Association support such action, in defiance of the obstinate and morally corrupt NRA leadership. In fact, the public is way ahead of Congress and the NRA leadership on this. A significant number of Americans also favor the restriction of large-capacity magazines.  FEARMONGER ALERT: This is NOT an attempt to eliminate the Second Amendment.  Hunt to thy heart’s content! Buy a handgun for protection. Buy two! But assault-style weapons?!  High-capacity magazines like those used in the slaughter of babies and their teachers in Newtown and other schools, not to mention in daily shootouts in urban centers nationwide?! C’mon.  Where does it end?

Advanced weaponry belongs in the hands of the military and law-enforcement officers, not in those of untrained, violence-loving, rogue and delusional cowboys who fancy themselves quasi federal agents.  Municipal police forces are perpetually upgrading their weaponry — at the taxpayers’ expense — in order to keep up with the crazy man-on-the-street’s latest obsessions in ammo and artillary.

Enough!

Enough of the killing.  It’s time for compassionate heroes to step forward, to change the image of America from that of a violent, blood-soaked nation to that of a warrior for peace. If you need more evidence, look no farther than the hollowed and pained face of Neil Heslin, whose six-year-old son Jesse died in the Sandy Hook massacre.  “I just keep reliving my loss,” he said.

His reality is devastating.  What’s more, it’s senseless.

If you’d like to be part of the solution, call your Congress members and insist on stiffer gun laws. Give a minute for those who lost their lives. It could be the most important thing you do all year!  Congress is expected to vote on gun measures next month. Find a contact list for your state at www.house.gov.

2.  Rape/Women’s Rights: During the past year, debates over rape — from failed Senate candidate Todd Akin’s ridiculous “legitimate rape” tirade (question: what’s an “illegitimate” rape???) to the disturbing circumstances surrounding the violation of a high-school girl by two Steubenville, Ohio football stars — the subject has been pushed to the forefront.  Maybe that’s okay.  These were not isolated incidents. There are many Akins, many Steubenvilles. We desperately need to have a national conversation about rape, or at least, many, many smaller ones.  We must educate children, as well as many adults, as to what constitutes rape and sexual assault.  We must make clear that rape doesn’t always involve intercourse or violence. But it is always about power. It is always a crime. We must rebuff the myths, such as that someone who is under the influence of alcohol or drugs can somehow give consent or somehow deserves to be raped. No one deserves to be raped. We must increase the services and compassion offered to survivors and stop making excuses for perpetrators.  We must insist on more leadership, quickly enacted protections, and immediate prosecutions. So educate yourself, then talk to your friends and family.  Rape crisis and domestic violence centers nationwide would welcome your involvement and are good places for both men and women to learn as well as to become advocates in the campaign to stop sexual assault. Here in Washington, the DC Rape Crisis Center offers volunteer opportunities for area residents as well as multiple types of support and resources for survivors. Visit them online at www.dcrapecrisiscenter.org or email them at dcdcc@dcrcc.org.

3.  Gay Marriage:  In 1958, Mildred Loving, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were sentenced to a year in a Virginia prison for marrying each other.  The marriage violated the state’s the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which prohibited marriage between people of different races. Hard to imagine, huh?

In 1967, the Lovings brought their case to the Supreme Count, which unanimously decided that Virginia’s statute was unconstitutional.  This ruling ended all race-based restrictions on marriages nationwide.

This week, the Supreme Court heard arguments on two cases dealing with same-sex  marriage.  The underpinnings of the cases echo those of Loving v. Virginia.  Both are about fairness and civil rights, nothing more. It’s hard to tell whether the court will make any changes just yet. But the arguments have catapulted the conversation and spotlighted injustices that have been felt by those in gay unions. This is good. Perhaps, in a decade or two, the fact that such discriminations occurred over gay relationships will seem as senseless as the unfairness the Lovings encountered seems to us today.

Congress has the power to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act so you might nudge lawmakers on this issue, too.  Then pat yourself on the back.  You are a hero to more of your fellow citizens than you know!

 

What Is More Fun than SOTU Analysis?

It’s time to ask the astute political questions following Tuesday’s State of the Union Address:

Q: Why did shock rocker and hard-right conservative Ted Nugent, who attended President Obama’s annual address, tell CBS News afterwards: “My reaction? I’m not allowed to do that because I’m supposed to keep my pants on.”

A: Nugent’s brain is located in a nether region, beneath his pants.

Q: Why did Marco Rubio, the talented Florida Congressman who gave the Republican response to President Obama’s State of the Union Address, pause mid-speech to sip from a bottle of water?

A: Who cares?  It’s not like he was doing vodka shots.  Was he?

Q: Why would legislators travel to their home states next week, knowing that, without Congressional action, teachers, federal employees, emergency workers, and our military will be at risk when the sequester, a.k.a. “Ruthless and Ridiculous Cuts No One, Except Maybe Mitch McConnell, Wants,” goes into effect in March?

A: Legislators are really a bunch of surfer dudes.

Q: Why must the President cajole and congratulate lawmakers for working toward an immigration plan, even though it’s clear there will be much feet dragging on the part of Republicans, despite the fact that they, like the rest of us, ended up here because of…well…immigration?

A: The aforementioned Republicans have amnesia.

Q: Why did Speaker of the House John Boehner oppose the President’s call to raise the minimum wage from $7.25 to $9 an hour when one in three American families are living in poverty?

A: He’s earning a maximum wage.

Random Musing: If the splintered and quickly tanking Republican Party truly wants to win over minority voters and women, the Speaker might reconsider his decision.  Just sayin’.

Q: Why do the National Rifle Association and many legislators — Republicans and Democrats — refuse to agree to common-sense measures to reduce gun violence?  (Hint: Answer has nothing to do with the second amendment.)

A: An utter lack of conscience. More than 1,700 people have died due to gun violence since the December 14th slayings in Newtown.

A. Second reason: $$$$$$

A. Third reason: $$$$$$

Q: Why must it take so long to transform the Violence Against Women bill into law?

A: Although the Senate has finally approved the bill, the House is nitpicking. Again. Members are arguing over the definition of “woman”.

Q: Why do Republicans refuse to acknowledge global warming?

A: They like making up their own science, stuff like, “We just got 18 inches of snow in New England!  What global warming?!”  Don’t get them started on evolution.

Q: What is more fun than SOTU analysis?

A: Gotta go with the vodka shots again.

 

Calling All Heroes

I’ll give you a minute to fill your glass with your holiday beverage or cocktail of choice.  Go on. I’ll hum carols while we wait….

You back?  All set?

Raise your glass!

Here’s to seeing more heroes emerge in Washington, D.C. in 2013!

(Glasses clink “virtually” as we toast.)

Way to toss back that martini, merlot, or cola!

What?! Spiked eggnog?!  Sounds yummy, if a little heavy, but, what the heck. It’s the holidays. Calories, schmalories.  We can start the diet-exercise regime in the new year, right?

Hmmm.

Hold on.

Mind re-filling those glasses?

What?  No humming this time?  Alright. I’ll just plug in the tree lights. But, I’ll have you know I was a member of my junior-high chorus!

Ready? Let’s try a Take Two because I’m suddenly stressing over the likelihood of procrastination.  Huh? No, not in terms of your fitness regimen.  I know you’ll hit the gym on Jan. 1. You’ve done it before.  The mojo will happen, especially when you discover you can’t zip those new leather pants under the tree.

I was referring to our elected leaders. We can’t give them until 2013. Procrastination is their mantra. We can’t allow it. Not when they haven’t completed their 2012 responsibilities. Not when they have failed to avoid the fiscal drop off, fiscal slide, or whatever you want to call it. Not when our country’s economic recovery is at stake.  I mean, we can hope for better leadership and cooperation in the new year. Better yet, we can insist upon it. Did you happen to see Wayne LaPierre on Meet the Press this past weekend?  Talk about an anti-leadership and anti-cooperation mindset! But I digress.  More on that in a second….

We need to demand that heroes in our government step forward. This minute! A deal on taxes, expenses, and our fiscal future must be approved before the new year if we are to avoid risking destruction to our financial markets akin to those that occurred last year, when irresponsible Congress members  — mostly the obtuse Tea Party faction — refused to compromise on the debt ceiling.

The bigger the deal the better.  Why must every bill that’s ultimately approved be a scaled-down, watered-down version of WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN?

Spokespersons for fruit-cake-stuffed and hung-over Republican leaders in the House of Representatives, all of whom are hunkered down in their comfy tax-payer-funded homes, are murmuring about maybe having a conference call today.  You know, if the spirit moves them.  The leadership promised its members that it would give 48 hours notice if it wanted members to return to work.  So far that hasn’t happened.  So the earliest we could see Congress in action is Friday.

They need to be here yesterday.  They need to sacrifice their remaining holiday to address vital interests of our nation.

Sacrifice. Not sure our elected leaders know its meaning. It’s what heroes do.

Compromise.  They do this, too.

President Obama is cutting short his Hawaiian Christmas tonight to return to the White House. He, House Speaker John Boehner, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid need to demand that ALL members of Congress return. Immediately. Forget the 48-hour pledge. What about 24 hours?  Twelve? Zero???

Leaders lead.  Heroes sacrifice.  They get the job done.  On time.

Even if we wanted to lower the bar, which we don’t, adults compromise and avoid childish blame games and power plays aimed at promoting their own agendas. If our kids behaved the way our elected officials do they’d be in timeouts until they graduated high school.

Here’s to growing the F up!  (You can toast this. Sorry it wasn’t phrased more eloquently.)

Honestly! On the fiscal cliff.  Each side had been so close you could practically smell a deal.  Then poof, everything crumbled.

THE CURRENT MAELSTROM: On the Right, Speaker Boehner, he of the failed Plan B (what the hell was that?!), hasn’t demanded compliance.  He’s been too weak to propose a bill that would depend on votes from both Dems and Republicans.  He’s failed to say to factions of his caucus (yes, you, Tea Party), that he’s willing to disappoint them, to forge ahead without them.  He’s failed to convey a sense of urgency. He’s failed to risk his own ass.

On the Left, the White House has been too proud to schedule another meeting with Boehner to convince the leader that the more moderate members of each party are ready to act. That they are too close to a deal to back down now.

You won the election, Mr. President.  Stop bowing down; you’re allowing others to dictate the process.  You’re even allowing Republicans to direct appointments to your cabinet.  Seriously?! Channel Nike and Just. Do. It.

Now…to the violence debates that have re-emerged since the Newtown tragedy.

Neither a heroic vibe nor a sense of sacrifice were evident in answers provided by National Rifle Association CEO and Chief Lobbyist Wayne LaPierre when he was interviewed by David Gregory on NBC this past weekend.  LaPierre refused to throw into the mix of possible school-massacre solutions — along with his (and other’s) proposed mental-health initiatives, security upgrades in schools, studies of violent films and video games — any gun-related reforms. First-graders are capable of more common sense and compromise.

LaPierre seemed so sure that no change would come from banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, tightening gun-owner qualifications, or increasing background checks that he wouldn’t even risk putting such issues on the table. Hmmm. There’s a hero for you.

More like a Coward. One more to add to the mix on Capitol Hill. One more whose selfish, shameful, and moronic defiances we can no longer tolerate.

If you truly believe assault-weapon bans or restrictions on high-ammo magazines won’t help, Mr. LaPierre, why not prove it by backing a test ban that’s more inclusive (assault-style weaponry and high-capacity magazines) than the short-lived one passed during the 90’s?

Step up.  Real men and women don’t hide behind their machine guns.

Real heroes are willing to try anything and everything to safeguard their children and their country.

Let us demand heroic action. Quickly. Noisily.

Even among ourselves, the average citizens.

Here’s to calling and emailing one’s federal representatives and demanding action on fiscal matters and on safety from violence in schools, churches, synagogues, mosques, movie theaters, post offices, office buildings, and college campuses.

Before it’s too late.  Again.

Cheers.

The Obtuseness and Insensitivity of the NRA

They called it a press conference.  But what the National Rifle Association conducted today in Washington could be better termed a commercial.

Wayne LaPierre, the group’s top lobbyist, stood before media representatives and called for placing armed officers in American schools. If the President and other leaders are deserving of armed protection, so are our children, he reasoned — the underlying message being that we need more guns, not fewer.

What stood out almost as much as packages under the Christmas tree for children who are no longer alive to unwrap them, was the bull-headedness of this organization and its unwillingness to channel real change.

The whole affair was a giant cop-out. The NRA did nothing unexpected.  Nothing courageous.

Mr. LaPierre spoke of violence in our movies and video games, issues of mental health, and parenting problems.  He blamed the media.  He blathered.  He danced around the truth. He repeatedly put forth the idea that the only solution to bad guys with guns is good guys with guns.

He failed to propose any meaningful discussions or solutions surrounding military-style weapons.  Let alone an assault weapons ban.

It was business as usual.  The NRA demonstrated it is willing to protect its brand and its pocketbook, not our children.  LaPierre refused to risk possible financial setbacks to the organization in order to safeguard our kids.  His plan calls for a more militarized society.  To say he and the NRA don’t get it is an enormous understatement.  Talk about dense.  Talk about selfish.  Talk about cold.

He might as well have stood behind the podium hugging a machine gun.

Mr. LaPierre took no questions, and QUESTIONS are what make a press conference a press conference. Just sayin’.

But, make no mistake, there will be questions.

Apparently, Mr. LaPierre hasn’t followed recent polls in the aftermath of the Newtown tragedy. Americans are not willing to settle for the same-old ignorance and short-sighted solutions.

We owe the victims and their families more.  Much more.

 

 

Leading with Our Hearts

‘Tis the season of stepping up.  Religious or not, most of us show flashes of a condition known as gushing heart this time of year.  We work a shift at a soup kitchen or homeless shelter.  We buy gifts for loved ones and donate gifts to children whose families can’t afford to have Christmas.  We make a contribution to our favorite charity.  We open our home to friends.  We may even find ourselves being more kind in general — waving a motorist ahead of our own vehicle, holding open doors, giving up a seat on the bus for an elderly person or someone who is physically challenged, wishing a stranger a good day, leaving a bigger tip.

Goodness, it seems, is contagious.

Nowhere was this phenomenon more evident than in the aftermaths of tragedies, such as Hurricane Sandy, and most recently, the heart-wrenching mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut that left 20 six- and seven-year-olds dead, as well as six staff members. The outpouring of sympathy and support from the community, first responders, and regular folks nationwide was immediate and overwhelming. It demonstrated goodness in especially sharp focus.

For once, race, age, religion, class, or party affiliation didn’t matter. We all felt it.  Our hearts ached.  We wanted to DO something.  We wanted to make it better.

Instinctively, our hearts broke open as wide as possible.  Our best selves stepped forward.

If only we could carry this spirit with us into the new year.  It would be such a tribute to the children and adults who died and to those who are suffering, and who will  likely continue to feel a sense of loss for years to come.

If only we could unite in meaningful ways to make our schools, theaters, office buildings, and shopping malls safer.

It’s possible.  All it takes is belief, commitment, and a willingness to lead with one’s heart. Sure, the National Rifle Association has a powerful lobby that donates millions of dollars to elect many federal representatives.  Such representatives, sadly, often place their financial greed over their duty to their country. They want to be re-elected more than they want to serve their constituents or do what is right. These individuals do not lead with their hearts. Take Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), for instance, who said — in the aftermath of Sandy Hook — that a ban on assault-style weapons “doesn’t make sense to me.”  Well, Senator Graham, it makes sense to those of us who dream of a civilized nation, to the families of all of those who died in Newtown and in other mass shootings. It makes sense to most law-enforcement professionals, many of whom broke down in tears following the Sandy Hook massacre.  They maintain it’s just plain crazy for average citizens to walk around with war-style weaponry and clips carrying 30 rounds of ammunition.

We’re not talking about outlawing hunting or stripping second-amendment rights.  I grew up eating the occasional rabbit or deer shot by one of my uncles or a friend of my grandmother’s.  Every citizen is entitled to enjoy this pastime if he or she chooses.  And every adult is entitled to protect himself. But we’re talking basic protection — say a handgun with a three-round clip or Mace — not a cache of military weapons capable of taking out dozens with the single squeeze of a trigger.

We are “the people” that the U.S. Constitution writes of. And we, the Real People, have a vote and a voice and a credit card. It is time to use these to insist that our leaders work to make our gathering places safe — from banning assault weapons and large magazines to incorporating thorough background checks for gun owners and guaranteeing health care for the mentally ill.  We need to identify troubled individuals early and perhaps consider limiting violent forms of entertainment for our youth, because violence doesn’t appear to be a random, far-fetched idea anymore. It isn’t something we need to go to the movies to witness.  It is here, among us.

If towering bullies like the NRA fails to heed our calls for change, perhaps they will sit up and take note when we use our pocketbooks to promote causes that improve public safety while boycotting purchases of automatic and semi-automatic weapons, and most importantly, voting against their candidates.

While we’re at it….while we’re being good and decent human beings, looking out for each other, maybe, just maybe we could accomplish other things. Things that will serve to sooth our battle-weary and beat-down nation. Perhaps we could seek compromise more often and insist that our elected leaders do the same.  A case in point: there is no reason why President Obama and the leadership of the House of Representatives should not be able to avert the fiscal cliff.  None.  The electorate has spoken.  More than 60 percent of voters — including many Republicans — favor a tax increase on the top two percent of income earners. Recent polls on the fiscal cliff show that 59 percent of the electorate sides with the President while 11 percent sides with Congress.  (Attention Tea Party and Mr. Boehner: this means the public is on to you; it knows that you are the fly in the ointment.) We want a deal that raises taxes on the highest income bracket and that cuts expenses.  Period.  We do not want a Plan B, Speaker Boehner.  You are too close to agreeing on a Plan A with the White House.  Do something big for a change!  Stand up to the Tea Party bullies in your caucus and strike a deal that requires the votes of BOTH Republicans and Democrats. Take a risk. Think “compromise.”  That would be the word you shuddered at during your “Sixty Minutes” interview last year.  The word you detest.  You know what? Get over it.

One more thing: we want an increase in the debt ceiling to be approved without petty politics and delay, so that our country’s credit rating doesn’t take another unnecessary dive.  I’m not sure how you sleep at night when you, single-handedly, are capable of taking down our entire economy with your obstinant and cowardly actions.

We must work together, selflessly — both parties, all people.  We must use our voices to save lives, improve the quality of living, and promote goodness. We must cease looking at every single f-ing legislative matter as an us-versus-them proposition.  We must choose leaders who are willing to risk their very jobs for the greater good. We must grow up. Or we will fail and fail miserably.

I think of all of those innocent kids who perished.  They were brimming with goodness, hope, and dreams of a bright future.

We owe it to them and to all children to create a country that promotes community and that lives up to their lofty ideals.

To do so, of course, doesn’t mean bad things won’t ever happen.  It means that we commit to do what is right and good.  What we KNOW is right and good. It means that we agree to risk our own selfish goals in the pursuit of something bigger and more meaningful.

It means that we pledge to lead with our hearts.

A Vote For Reality TV

One convention down.  One to go.  Then we will arrive the moment of greatest anticipation, the moment when America truly shines: the start of the new Fall TV season.

If I was a happy-face person, this is where I’d stick them. Yay, Fall!  (Happy Face). Yay, Sunday night football. (Happy Face). Yay, TV that doesn’t bore me to tears or embarrass me over how moronic (Clint Eastwood) and how deceitful (Paul Ryan) some humans, even those raising kids, can be! (Double happy face).

The worst reality shows can sometimes offers more “truth” than a political convention.  Often it’s ugly truth, but at least it’s authentic.

We can only hope that speakers at this week’s Democratic Convention consider history and facts and the welfare of all Americans, not just the rich or the white or the overtly religious. We can hope that Betty White turns up for humor and inspiration. Otherwise, we’ll have to install some realty-like judges and on-the-spot fact checkers at upcoming mass political gatherings.  Maybe there could even be a gong!

There were a few worthy moments at the Republican National Convention.  Former Secretary of State Rice, for instance, seemed to address all Americans when she spoke of the importance of creating quality educational opportunities.  Other speakers mainly riled up the red-meat-craving crowd by playing on their emotions. What’s a convention without emotion? Mostly, though, the words were hollow, spewed without regard to fact.

Virginia Govern Robert McDonnell, better known as “the ultrasound governor” for wanting to control the uteruses of pregnant women, spoke, ironically, of how government needs to step back and cede more decisions to its citizens. Umm…question:  Are women citizens?  Just wondering.

Rick Not-Sane-torum spoke about the family. Apparently, he has a direct line to the Almighty because he firmly conveyed that single mothers and gay couples who are raising children are not, technically, families?  It seems, family is a technical thing, not a love thing.  Who’d of thunk it?

Then Paul Ryan, the buff, boy-next-door-version of a vice presidential nominee, conveyed mouth-dropping inaccuracies about the closing of an auto plant in his Wisconsin hometown, about medicare, and about welfare, to name a few.  Ryan, who likes his iphone but apparently doesn’t use it to bone up on American history, failed to acknowledge 1) that the plant he identified actually closed under President Bush’s watch and that President Obama rescued much of the American auto industry with a courageous bailout that he (Ryan) voted for; 2) that he and Mitt Romney are planning to turn medicare into a voucher program for seniors while President Obama is planning to retain the program in its current user-friendly form, 3) and that welfare still involves a train-for-work component. Republicans are channeling racism in their inaccurate characterization of welfare — implying that it is for lazy people (i.e. minorities) who don’t want to work.  What is it that the Bible preaches about our actions toward the less fortunate? C’mon conservative Christians.  Help me out here.

Then came Big Mitt with his big lie: claiming that Republicans initially supported the President.  Maybe they thought the home audience would be drunk by this point of the evening. (If only!) The Romster said we are a “forgiving” and understanding people who initially pulled for Obama to succeed.  So, let me get this straight: Ryan, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and others who met the night of Obama’s inauguration to determine how they might defeat every proposal the new president made, were actually rooting for him?  Wow, that’s some crazy-ass strategy – pretending to plot against someone.

Beware Republican and Independent voters.

Beware of being guided strictly by emotion. Vote with your head.  Know that yes, things are tough, but that in every month since Obama was elected, he has added jobs. He has reinvigorated the auto industry. Neither could be said for Bush.  Obama has had an impact on the war on terror (a little guy known as Bin Laden is no more and many of our troops are coming home) and has improved healthcare for millions.  If Romney repeals healthcare, as he says he will, he will rob millions of twenty-somethings of automatic coverage and make pre-existing conditions a reason to be turned down for people of all ages.

Know, if you pull that lever for Romney, that it was the Republican Congress that refused to compromise on even the most basic legislation proposed by Obama, that they were the Party of No, not the Party of Now.  That never in the history of America have elected “leaders” screwed the American people so royally by refusing to pass every common-sense bill the President proposed, from the Jobs Bill (yet they regularly gripe about how nothing is being done to resolve unemployment) to measures to correct credit-card fraud.  And they threw up these seemingly criminal road blocks at a time when citizens of this country were scratching for every foothold they could find.  Yet, these very legislators slept at night — in a comfortable home, with plenty of food, and the best health-care plans our tax dollars could buy.

Know that Obama cares about availing opportunities to all citizens, not just protecting the wealthy — and that this is NOT socialism, it is giving every citizen access to his or her inalienable rights.  Remember that Pledge of Allegiance that, every so often, Republicans panic will be removed from our public schools, the one that ends with, “and liberty and justice for all”?

While we’re on the topic of screwing, Republican lawmakers in half a dozen states, from Texas and Ohio to Florida and South Carolina, are attempting to sway the upcoming November election by requiring special voter IDs and by eliminating or restricting early-voting opportunities. These measures have been overturned in numerous cases by state courts.  No matter, the bully-like Republican legislators intend to appeal.

Normally, I’d place the entire blame of such underhanded tactics — tactics designed to discourage minorities and the poor from getting to the polls — on legislators alone.  But it’s clear that regular Republican voters need to stand up here.  If you don’t; if you allow it to happen, then you are party to a crime. All it takes is a phone call.  Tell your state representatives that winning at all costs is not winning.  Women and minorities fought too hard for the right to vote.

Fight for your candidate. Cast your vote. But do it under fair and honest circumstances.  Do it with every eligible voter having access to the polls.  Otherwise, you will indeed be “taking America back,” as conservatives are wont to say — back to the 1800’s.

That’s pre-realty TV — heck, it’s even pre-black-and-white TV.

Going Rogue, Progressively Speaking

Our President has tried reasoning, logic, compromise, golfing with the tan-man Speaker of the House, brewing his own beer, wearing Mom jeans.  All were no goes.

So now, as the Republication National Convention heads to the eye of the hurricane, a.k.a. Tampa, with a bold and, some might say, callous platform endorsing a ban on all abortions, the elimination of minimum wage, opposition to gay marriage, and deep cuts in healthcare, let us on the Left go rogue.

Let us employ over-the-top creativity in solving our country’s most idiotic problems.  Let us abandon compassion and intellect and like our gun-toting and adorably obtuse Tea Party friends, pull solutions out of our poop holes.

On abortion and reproduction:  

Implant a uterus in every American male.

Voila! No more talk of banning abortion or insisting that employers need not cover the cost of birth control.

On healthcare inadequacies between the sexes:

Order mammograms for those with “man boobs” and see whether cancer detection for women doesn’t advance at the speed of light.

On equal pay for equal work (something Republicans in Congress say they believe in but just can’t seem to approve.): 

Have men wear Spanx.  If this doesn’t convince them women are worth every penny they are, nothing will.

Option Two:  Elect more women.  Come to think of it, this would probably solve everything.

On the Vatican’s clampdown on nuns who stand up for the rights of those on the periphery — the poor, the unemployed, the homeless, minorities, women, gays, etc. — and in doing so dare to question the church’s teachings: 

Okay.  This isn’t strictly a U.S. issue.  It just fits with the patriarchal theme.

Solution Part 1: Spanx distribution to constrict men of the Church.

Solution Part 2; Spanx burning ceremony for the cool, compassionate, common-sense nuns.

On the proposal (Republican, natch) to eliminate the minimum wage:

Fine.  As long as we lowly wage earners get to work a schedule modeled after our federal representatives: two weeks on, two weeks off.  All paid, of course.  Oh, plus permission to drink excessively and skinny dip in the Holy Land. Or Disney Land.  Whichever.

On convincing Congress to approve a Violence Against Women Act that protects ALL women in America, not just straight women or religious women or women with born-in-the-U.S.A tattoos:

Flash the men in Congress your vagina or, if you are shy, a photo of your vagina.  They are very afraid of vaginas.

On having Congress approve a tax on the top 1 percent of income earners:

I’d say flash them your empty middle-income bank account, but that won’t motivate them to do squat.

I’m going with the vagina again.

 

 

Where’s the spine?

Mitt Romney, where are you?

Are you on the Sunday News shows? Nope.

Are you talking to reporters along rope lines?  Nope.

Did you tell a reporter who asked about your stance on gay marriage and equality that you’d rather talk about something significant? 

Are you a leader? Can you stand up for what is blatantly right and true?  Can you condemn wrong doing?

Okay, let’s be fair.  At times, Mr. Romney and President Obama do things that are purely political.  They are, after all, politicians.  Both did stupid things in their respective pasts. Mr. Romney reportedly bullied a peer in his prep-school class and tied the now-famous family dog to the roof of his car. President Obama smoked some dope and allegedly was cool towards women he dated.

I’m not condoning either man’s behaviors.  I’m just saying that young people behave stupidly.  They do things they often regret as adults.

What’s clear is that the President has matured, that he’s used his experiences — good and bad — to develop into a thinker and a leader.  A parallel type of evolution in Mr. Romney is not so evident.  He doesn’t quite meet the criteria of a leader. He wasn’t even able to reflect on the prep-school incident without a smirk and a giggle.

What’s more galling is the regular and repeated opportunities Mr. Romney has to lead and his deliberate dodging of such opportunities.  He’s an expert dodger.

This week: The Fair Pay Act, which would guarantee that employers have to substantiate any discrepancies in pay based on qualifications rather than gender, has been repeatedly panned by Republicans in both the House and the Senate.  It’s been rejected by the same Republican “leaders” who say they support equal pay for women.  Go figure. On it’s own, the lack of action and affirmation is a disgrace that should infuriate all voters and especially women.  But add to it Mr. Romney’s wimpy response — that he believes in fair and equal pay for women but doesn’t know what his stance is on the legislation. Really?!

It’s not rocket science, Mr. Romney.  You, who can stand to garner the female vote more than anyone, ought to realize this.  Any woman with half a brain (and, for the record, most of us possess WAY more) knows you are side-stepping the issue.  She knows you are falling in line behind your political cronies and deep-pocketed backers, rather than doing the right thing and standing up.  For her.

Last week: Mr. Romney huddled in the corner while his new bud, bully and half-wit extraordinaire Donald Trump, re-introduced the birth-certificate nonsense regarding President Obama. Oh, sure.  Mr. Romney quietly and practically inaudibly said he believes the President was born in America.  But he didn’t do what leaders do: he didn’t say, Enough is enough.

Last month: President Obama, risking his political standing in several states, announced his support for gay marriage. Mr. Romney countered by saying he was not in favor of same-sex marriage. What stood out even more, though, was Mr. Romney’s lack of a backbone when it came to the resignation of his foreign policy advisor, a homosexual man.  Rather than fight for this man’s continued tenure, Romney did what he is apt to do.  He stood back.  He let a good man go, for all of the wrong reasons. He made us wonder if he owns a pair.

We could go on: To Mr. Romney’s lack of a backbone toward Rush Limbaugh, who calls women who stand up for women’s reproductive rights “sluts.”  To his pandering to big-money types who believe in greed over all else. To his backing of the church, even when the church’s teachings and beliefs endanger women’s basic rights and health. To his continued practice of going into hiding when talk turns to doing the big interview or press conference.

Leadership means leading, Mr. Romney.

Time for a spinal implant.

Cogitating on Dumb Stuff in Politics

 

Here’s a rundown of questionable and stupid moves in national politics and related spheres during the past two weeks, and what some of us think about it all:

Mitt Romney singing every verse of “America the Beautiful.” Twice :  Stop it! Please? If you must sing to prove you can hold your own (not really) with the Crooner in Chief, can you, like the President, just give us a stanza rather than the whole bleeping song?

An irritated Rick Santorum, telling sick adults and the parents of ill children, to suck it up when it comes to the high cost of medicine:  Seriously?  You are siding with drug companies?  Do you know how much money these companies make and how much power they wield, much of it the result of questionable tactics? Are you naive? Are you heartless?  Are you on crack?!

Newt attacking the media for asking him about past infidelities: Um…Public Figure + Dumb Personal Decisions = Public Questioning and Humiliation.  Get used to it.

Mitt on saying he’s not worried about the poor: Dude! Do you realize the poor get a vote?

Susan G. Komen Foundation’s decision to stop funding Planned Parenthood: Saying the move isn’t political is like saying cigarette smoking isn’t harmful.

One Million Moms protesting J.C. Penney’s hiring of Ellen Degeneres as a spokesperson, arguing the star’s homosexuality will drive customers away:  Wondering what you million moms will do when one of your million kids comes out to you?  Push him “back in”?!  Kudos to J.C. Penney for sticking with Ellen.

Donald Trump endorsing Mitt, after calling him a “small businessman,” and Herman Cain endorsing Newt, but saying he likes Mitt, too: Ego times four + Inauthentic times four = A whole lot of crazy.